Remember folks -- whether you agree with every detail or not. It could have been you!
On Tuesday, June 4, 2013 5:15:48 PM UTC-4, vkernus wrote:
Dalton,It would be highly unlikely for the Judge to bring forth an new complaint. Ideally, Remick gets off without having to pay the fine and then we can work forward to clear up the ambiguity while striving to promote water safety.Victor
On Tuesday, June 4, 2013 4:30:58 PM UTC-4, Dalton Terrell wrote:I think Victor's lawyering is exactly what is needed in the short term to help clarify this wading issue. Obviously in the longer term, we should advocate for less ambiguity in the statutes, increased safe wading access and better education of the NPS police officers.On the trespassing issue, I do not believe that Remick was actually trespassing in the park at the moment the officer approached him if he was below the high water mark, which is probably why he didn't receive a ticket for this. The judge certainly cannot bring an additional charge of trespassing while Remick is in court.Dalton
http://www.tpfr.org
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Tidal Potomac Fly Rodders" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tidal-potomac-fly-rodders+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to tidal-potomac-fly-rodders@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tidal-potomac-fly-rodders/64e5b6d3-1104-40a0-ab79-fc1657dd60ff%40googlegroups.com?hl=en-US.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
No comments:
Post a Comment